"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> writes:
In the case at hand, I believe "Interfaces Library" is a lousy name. If I were naming the library with no though to its possible future acceptance into boost, I might call it "C++ with Interfaces" (the name of Christopher's article). If it were eventually accepted into Boost, I'd change the name to Boost.Interfaces, but the de facto name, at least for a while, would be "Boost.Interfaces (formerly C++ with Interfaces)."
To sum up, I prefer Dave's original suggestion, the "[proposed/contemplated/suggested] Boost Interfaces Library".
As far as I'm concerned, people can choose any one of the ways to talk/type that makes it clear that it's not yet an official Boost library. We don't have to all agree on a convention. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com