Re: [boost] Moving away from SourceForge

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Diego Rodriguez-Losada < diego.rlosada@gmail.com> wrote:

...

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:

...

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Diego Rodriguez-Losada < diego.rlosada@gmail.com> wrote:

...

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Louis Dionne wrote:

Hi all,

As part of JFrog, I would like to offer Bintray services for this migration. Bintray counts with several features that could be relevant for the Boost community and users:

* Not stagnating - 2 billion downloads a month and growing * Backed up by Akamai – the most powerful CDN in the world for faster downloads * Watches and badges – uses can follow and get notifications when new versions are released * Organizations support – people that create and publish Boost can be part of the organization with powerful permissions * REST API – tooling around resolution and deployments of Boost, it's very easy and powerful with Bintray

Bintray will sponsor the hosting, so no costs for the Boost community, in a similar way as JFrog did for hosting the Mac OSX Homebrew binary bottles. We might be able to also provide support for executing the migration, writing scripts for copying the artifacts from sourceforge, etc.

FYI.. We already use Bintray, and it was the first alternative I tried after evaluating various https://bintray.com/boostorg. But there where various problems we encountered to use it for general releases. The key one being what Tom mentioned:

=== One thing that we found that couldn't be replicated at any of the other major OSS hosting sites was the ability to have the windows binaries in the same location. These files are quite large (200MB x 12 visual studio version + 1.4GB for the combined archive), and none of the sites that we looked at could support them. There was also (I believe) a general consensus that we wanted to keep those at the same place as the source distribution. ===

Is it possible to support that use case? As an example here are the files we are talking about we had problems with < https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost-binaries/1.63.0/>.

Yes, the issue is that you probably hit the OSS quota, not prepared for such large binaries. Did you contact bintray for support on this?

I don't remember if I did.. I know I contacted them for various issues but don't know if that was one of them.

The sponsoring would consist of raising the quota, specifically for the

...

Boost project.

Hi again, The quotas have been raised for bintray/boostorg organization, up to 100Gb storage, 20Tb traffic and 2.5Gb file size. It should be good for hosting the Windows binaries too in the same place. Just a question (from my ignorance), why the 1.5Gb msvc-all archive? The download stats clearly show a high preference for specific installers, maybe that one could be dropped without much impact. Please tell me if you have any other issues, feedback, or need further help. Best, Diego

...

I am working on the details and checking that there aren't other limitations, I will contact back when I have more info.

Great.

-- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/ mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost