9 May
2013
9 May
'13
10:39 a.m.
On 04/23/2013 05:08 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
Right. What I meant to say was that __SYSC_ZARCH__ is not defined by GCC at all. On GCC, __s390__ is the define for both, and __s390x__ explicitly for the 64-bit one.
I just noticed that clang defines __zarch__ in addition to __s390__ and __s390x__.