24 Apr
2005
24 Apr
'05
5:18 a.m.
"Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek@hotmail.com> writes:
"Thorsten Ottosen" wrote:
Besides, boost.date_time I think these other libs are good candidates (maybe with slight modifications):
2. optional
This would be very useful addition.
It would likely require update of algorithms, e.g. std::sort to deal with containers of optionals.
I disagree. That's what custom comparison operators are for. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com