"Tom Brinkman" <reportbase@gmail.com> wrote in message news:30f04db60610051851x13a53e92s8c3ec296a4ec8689@mail.gmail.com...
from Andy Little
Are the GIL Authors interested interested in defending their library against my criticisms or do they expect it to get into boost by default? If it does get in to Boost without any defence whatsoever, then it will confirm some suspicions (I currently think are unfounded) I have about Boost.
Thats some comment, I'd like to know more about what your suspicions are?
The main one is that the deal is already sealed for this library. I hope that is wrong as I said.
As far as GIL the review, today is the first day of the review so give the authors a break.
Well, my original post has been around for three days or more, which AFAICS is adequate time to prepare a response. It seemed to me like the GIL authors had just decided to ignore my comments. And that struck me as a little weird, unless... regards Andy Little