----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Huber" <ah2003@gmx.net> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 9:51 AM Subject: [boost] Re: [prereview request][fsm]
[...]
Yes, you can do that if you want (it is a per state machine policy). The default is to always dispatch an exception_thrown event.
Interesting solution! catch { try { throw; } catch( type1 ) { ... } }
never thought about it. This is why I didn't know how to make it generic. It makes sense now.
I've written code like that. It lets you centralize a bunch of exception handling: try { ...code that throws } catch ( ... ) { HandleExceptions (); } void HandleExceptions () { try { throw; } catch ( type1 ) {} catch ( type2 ) {} catch ( type3 ) {} and so on. } -- -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:marshall@idio.com> I want a machine that thinks I'm more important than it is, and acts like it. -- Eric Herrmann