Re: [boost] Interest in flat_iterator for nested containers?

Christoph Heindl wrote:

...

Clever! Though in this instance, the minimum is identical to the gcd, at which point you could just assign the traversal tags to consecutive integers ;)

I'm not sure if I understood you correctly: Assigning, for example, 1:readable, 2:single pass and 3:forward iterable would yield 1:readable for the gcd of 2:single pass and 3:foward which is not true (IMHO :).

Oh, I meant that you could replace gcd with min (in a linear hierarchy). - Jeff