On 22.04.2011 12:07, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Gordon Woodhull<gordon@woodhull.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Vicente BOTET<vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
I don't like the OO design. I think that a more generic approach could be applied to this domain, and add a dynamic approach in top of the static one.
...
The library should be redesigned with a generic approach and the interfaces be more user friendly and safe. I know the author is against the generic approach so I don't expect he will change later on if the library is accepted.
+1
Does this mean that you prefer to have no locale library instead of this one in Boost?
It's not that the library is a sloppy work, as I see it. You just have different expectations.
all software aspects affect on the code quality and design is in the first place. A Boost's library must have *excellent* quality but this one isn't even good enough (IMO) -- - Do you speak English? Мужик с глубоким вздохом: - Yes I do. А хули толку?