28 Feb
2006
28 Feb
'06
10:03 p.m.
On 2/28/06, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't exactly understand where plural form cames from. Isn't, for example, current named_shared_object references _single_ shared memory block?
Yes, but you create named/anonymous "objects" or "instances" of classes using construct<> functions. That's why they have proposed "objects". I know, but I think even if the instance of this class allows creating multiple objects of other types, doesn't turn the object itself on multiple objects. It just the same factory object that can "generate" others.
-- Best regards, Zigmar