[boost] Re: Suggestion for iterator_adaptor

"Fredrik Blomqvist" <fredrik_blomqvist@home.se> writes:

David Abrahams wrote: [snip]

...

I'm soliciting suggestions for the name of the member. All names with suffixes like "_t" will be rejected, and be aware that base is already taken for other purposes. Currently my thoughts are

super // super crtp // ugly

Why not something related to "iterator" and/or "adaptor"? iterator_adaptor_base? adaptor_base?

and iterator_facade_base or facade_base? Hmm, I guess in case of multiple inheritance that approach is more useful. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com