28 Dec
2012
28 Dec
'12
7:38 a.m.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:39 AM, iwg molw5 <iwg.molw5@gmail.com> wrote:
Non-intrusive serialization is supported in a manner similar to that used by Boost.Serialization.
Could you elaborate? A short example would certainly help.
The performance of the library is difficult to comment on. The serializable library does not introduce any intrinsic overhead over an equivalent set of operations performed on a raw C structure - does that answer your question?
Does the library control the validity of the serialized data when deserializing? Is there an associated overhead?