Beman Dawes wrote:
Speaking of that, I notice that SourceForge has a Thumbs up/Thumbs down rating system now.
We need to take a look at the roughly 10% of the Boost ratings that get a "Thumbs down" to see what is bothering users.
I have always wanted a "rating system" on a library by libray basis. Ideally, this would be a web page that could be invoked for any library library: select library Rate 1 (unacceptable) ... 5(great) the following: functionality/utility(trivial)..(indispensable) robustness(flakey),..,(non percieved) percieved performance(slow),...(unperceptible) documentation (useless).(tax code)..(a pleasure to read and use) ease of use(tax code)...(no-brainer) .... response to questions/support(awol)...(right next to me) overall quality comments:.... and a summary page for each library total number of responses results for above questions overall rating. links to comments/pages/ar ratings. Robert Ramey