5 Nov
2013
5 Nov
'13
12:50 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Gavin Lambert
Do you think that some of those assumptions are flawed?
Another example is in MSVC11 (and I assume is still in MSVC12) there is a minor bug in std::chrono which makes it impractical to use in code that needs high precision of time. This forced me to use boost::chrono, which forced me to use boost::thread instead of std::thread because the time-related interface aren't compatible and require tons of casting. Having alternative implementations of the standard, in particular when it's mostly the same code whatever the target plateform, is a good thing.