30 May
2014
30 May
'14
1:08 p.m.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Julian Gonggrijp
Dear Boost mailing list members,
I would like to revive the topic of Boost inter-library dependencies, suggest two global changes to Boost and ask whether you agree with the course of action I propose.
The following (evolutionary) global changes to Boost should be planned and given priority over any other proposals [e.g. 5], in the following order:
1. Reduction of dependencies between Boost libraries. 2. Simple but effective automation of dependency handling.
I am in favor. With #2, as others have mentioned, it should be enumerated by dependency for each supported toolset. (which also gives a nice list of supported toolsets for that library) Tom Kent