22 Sep
2005
22 Sep
'05
4:14 p.m.
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:23:16 +0100, "Andy Little" <andy@servocomm.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
...To be honest, I'm not convinced that
too much focus on comparing this concept with a real-world guard is a good thing.
hmm... if its not conceptually a guard... then why call it one?
Indeed. Maybe there's a better name for it, I don't know. I don't mind the name, just the implications of taking the name too literally.
How about :
guard.up(); guard.down();
I'd prefer more descriptive verbs. -- Be seeing you.