On 2/25/04 8:16 PM, "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> wrote:
"Phil Richards" <news@derived-software.ltd.uk> wrote in message news:20040225182859.C873D8C016@derisoft.derived-software.demon.co.uk... [snip]
people would understand "io" as an abbreviation with no real potential for confusion. (And if they are confused, I hate to think what they will think an "iostream" is.) If the stuff ever made it into the standard, then you'd get "std::io" which would make ex-C programmers happy too.
So, do we move filesystem to boost::io::filesystem? :-)
Will the extra 'filesystem' namespace be necessary?
Earlier in this thread, didn't we say that a third namespace level should be avoided? -- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com