2 Jun
2010
2 Jun
'10
8:56 p.m.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tomas Puverle" <tomas.puverle@morganstanley.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 9:34 PM Subject: Re: [boost] [boost::endian] Summary of discussion #1
By the same reasoning, we should also have a boost::endian_swap<>(), no? (Which would be the 'in-place' version)
Are you using the word swap because the bytes are swaped in the implementation? Vicente