
3 Aug
2005
3 Aug
'05
4:27 p.m.
From: David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com>
"Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek@hotmail.com> writes:
Anyway, saying that symmetry requires
none_of(a) == any_of(b)
to be equivalent to
any_of(a) == none_of(b)
is about as valid as saying
3*x == 1+y
must be equivalent to
1+x == 3*y
It makes no sense to me.
I was doing that, wasn't I? It is nonsensical. Thanks for clarifying my blunder. -- Rob Stewart stewart@sig.com Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;