Hi guys, I've just committed a prefix file with the new macro names that will be used for compiler identification: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?BoostConfig> This is basically your last chance to point out better names for them; I've marked with a comment the ones which diverge significantly from the built-in identification macro names (e.g.: BOOST_CXX_CW, whereas the built-macro is named __MWERKS__). The file is in /boost/config: <http://boost.cvs.sourceforge.net/boost/boost/boost/config/prefix.hpp?revision=1.1&view=markup> One other issue: suppose a compiler defines M=0xMMmmpp to indicate version MM.mm.pp (a common case). Let's take 0x030411 as an example. Now, since we want the user to be able to write: #if BOOST_CXX_FOO == BOOST_VERSION_NUMBER(3, 4, 11) // (a) we have to define BOOST_CXX_FOO in a way that "transforms the single parts" of M as if they were expressed in decimal. If we simply take M & 0xFF as sub-minor version number then it actually results in 17 (11 base sixteen) and (a) will never be true. So, is it my understanding correct that what we want to do is some machinery like this? #define SUBMINOR \ ( (M & 0xF) + 10* ((M & 0xF0)>>4) ) #define MINOR \ ( ((M & 0x0F00) >> 8) + (10* ((M & 0xF000)>> 12)) ) #define MAJOR \ ( ((M & 0x0F0000) >> 16) + (10 * (( M &0xF00000) >> 20) )) #define BOOST_CXX_FOO \ BOOST_VERSION_NUMBER(MAJOR, MINOR, SUBMINOR) (note the various multiplications by 10, to "interpret" everything as decimal) -- [ Gennaro Prota, C++ developer for hire ] [ resume: available on request ]