JOAQUIN M. LOPEZ MUÑOZ wrote:
________________________________________ De: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] En nombre de Sebastian Redl [sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at] Enviado el: martes, 20 de enero de 2009 22:39 Para: boost@lists.boost.org Asunto: Re: [boost] A PP trick to define a synchronized block java-like macro
vicente.botet wrote:
for (VARS DECLARATION, bool __continue=true; __continue; __continue=false)
I'm afraid this is not valid syntax. The first clause of the for-statement is a for-init-statement, which can be either an expression with a semicolon, or a simple-declaration. A simple-declaration lets you declare any number of variables, but they must all have the same declspec, i.e. the same fundamental type (with variations like "pointer to", "array of" or "function returning").
The following variation would do:
for (VARS DECLARATION, *continue_hlp_,**continue_=&continue_hlp_; continue_; continue_=0)
This is brilliant! Weird workaround at its best. Sebastian