19 Aug
2009
19 Aug
'09
5:20 p.m.
DE wrote:
on 18.08.2009 at 20:28 joel wrote :
it seems reasonable but it can be implemented through non-member function and still be readable even more readable acually
set(m, list(x, y), val);
or even
set(m, list(x, y)) = val
how can this be more readable than m(x,y) = val ???
set(m)(x, y) = val;//? no?
set is superfluous i think -- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35