David Abrahams wrote:
on Wed Aug 22 2007, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
If the reason is to make the permissions easier to manage. Did you consider a more traditional svn structure of:
svn/boost/release/ trunk/ (boost-root) tags/ RC_1_35_0_n/ (boost-root) 1_35_0/ (boost-root)
??
I don't understand what trunk/ is doing under release/ The trunk itself will only rarely be the same as something we release, right?
Under Rene's scheme there are two trunk's - the development trunk and the release trunk. Several people commented that they liked the tradition "trunk" name rather than the "next" name I proposed. I agreed with them, as I was finding the "next" name awkward. Do you have a name you would find less confusing? --Beman