Hi Rob & All, My 2 cents: "Boost Candidate.Library" seems awkward. As David suggested, a precise English description in email (using "proposed", "candidate" or whatever) should be adequate. All docs and code should look as it will if accepted, with a possible disclaimer on the front page of the docs and/or comments in the main header. Not (entirely) serious: As we are all C++ folks, we could use more compact syntax. Say, "--Boost.Library" or "?Boost.Library?" or maybe even "!Boost.Library" to convey the desired semantics. :) Don --- Rob Stewart <stewart@sig.com> wrote:
If your laissez faire approach is acceptable to folks, then I agree. If something a little more formal is desirable, then something else is needed. I'd like to see some consensus from folks on the list.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/