AMDG On 03/28/2011 09:41 AM, lcaminiti wrote:
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard-2 wrote:
On 03/26/2011 03:19 PM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote: > Hello all, > > I am updating Boost.Local docs and I could use a some help in getting > the Alternatives section right > http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/local/libs/local/doc/html/boost_local...
You might include compile time and run time benchmarks, information about error message quality, and polymorphic capabilities. Additionally, you might note that with C++0x local classes can be used with templates.
Good suggestions. I will include all of those.
How would the polymorphic (type) row read? (I don't fully understand this...) For example:
Type Polymorphism ------------------ Boost.Local: Yes but only of type of bound parameters (not for normal function parameters). Local Classes: No. C++0X Lambdas: Yes but only of type of bound parameters (not for normal function parameters). Boost.Lambda: No?? Boost.Phoenix: No??
Is this correct?
I have don't know whether it's correct, because, I have no idea what you are talking about. Boost.Lambda and Boost.Phoenix produce Polymorphic Function Objects i.e. Function objects that can be called with different parameter types and which suppot boost::result_of. In Christ, Steven Watanabe