Andreas Huber wrote:
John Maddock wrote: [snip]
What should we do about the *LC* problems? Is it worth bothering with those?
Um, don't know, in theory yes, but there are a lot truly trivial issues showing up, for example there are dozens of html redirect files, that have no content except a http-refresh redirection, we could just mark these so they don't show up in the report I guess?
Sure, how can I mark them?
I don't remember and I can't find it in the docs :-( You may have to dig into the source or ask Rene!
What about the People pages? Do they need license and copyright or should we just mark them too?
Yep I guess they do need license and copyright.
I'm more concerned about all the broken links reported in the X report, some of our documentation looks to be in a very poor state :-(
Ok.
If someone would like to look at this, and/or nag the authors concerned that would be great!
Aren't people automatically nagged about this anyway? If not I can surely do some personalized nagging :-).
I think the messages are only going to the mailing list at present. I guess in order of importance we need to fix: 1) Regressions. 2) Coding guidelines violations (min/max/namespaces etc). 3) Missing copyright on source files. 4) Broken links in docs. 5) Everything else :-) Oh and somewhere into all that, we need to decide whether users will be building 1.34 with bbv2 or bbv1. If the former then we need a new set of getting started instructions at a minimum. If you can instigate some personalised nagging on any of the above and/or fix anything trivial you come across that would certainly be most welcome :-) Thanks! John.