Re: [boost] A question to the release manager

Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:

"Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb@hotmail.com> wrote

...

If BOOST_TYPEOF_NATIVE is defined, BOOST_TYPEOF will work w/o type registration through either true native support of the compiler or MSVC-specific trick (in which case MSVC_TYPEOF_HACK is also defined).

Hmmm, I just noticed that this is not named correctly. Should be probably BOOST_TYPEOF_MSVC_HACK. This is not a matter of functionality -- just compliance to the macro naming rules... Will we have a chance to correct this in this release?

Sorry, but no. Thomas -- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org