11 Sep
2010
11 Sep
'10
2:31 a.m.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:31 PM, David Greene <greened@obbligato.org> wrote:
On Sunday 05 September 2010 11:31:55 Doug Gregor wrote:
I want to see great, new ideas in C++ parsing and development tools, but I strongly feel that those ideas could be far better disseminated through extending/adapting/changing existing the large-scale, industry-backed projects (GCC or Clang/LLVM) than by bringing up a third large-scale competitor.
I generally agree with this, which is why the whole libc++ project is highly unfortunate.
How so? It has a better license, more designed for modern architectures, made by someone at Apple, although not done yet.