Re: [boost] Re: boost::function feature request?

David Abrahams wrote:

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> writes:

...

Of course f = t; is merely a shorthand way of spelling f = boost::lambda::constant(t), but a dependency on lambda isn't always desirable.

Thoughts?

By the same token, one could argue that this functionality ought to be pushed into boost::bind.

I'm not sure what you mean. What functionality ought to be pushed into boost::bind?