John Maddock wrote:
Daniel James wrote:
On 18/02/2008, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
There is a seemingly endless set of improvements to *could* be made to 1.35.0. But I think that it is time to try to identify any showstoppers, fix those, and defer everything else to the next release. Are broken copyright links considered important enough for this release?
Looks like this is all date-time library stuff?
Given that this is a trivial search and replace to fix, and effects only comments not code, I'd say lets fix it, especially if you're willing to do the job ;-)
Beman?
...sorry if this ends up being a duplicate... Wow, is it really possible that this has been broken for 3 releases? Anyway, instead of fixing the code why not just forward the -1.0.txt url to the _1_0.txt on the web site? That's a 1 minute change and we can fix the code in the next release. Jeff