20 Nov
2010
20 Nov
'10
1:50 p.m.
On 11/20/2010 7:25 AM, John Maddock wrote:
This sounds bad. Can anybody confirm?
The tests already confirm it <http://tinyurl.com/24lpbq4>.
Crap. Might I suggest we pull the release and reissue as a point release after this is fixed?
Adding back the missing context:
Is this type_traits specific, or should boost.typeof work on that platform... I'm sure it used to?
I don't know. Is common_type the only trait to use boost.typeof? If so, can we just comment out the #include of common_type.hpp in type_traits.hpp as a stop-gap?
BTW there are a *lot* of failures with VC7.1 relating to this.
By "this" do you mean the type_traits error or the boost.typeof failure? -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com