11 May
2010
11 May
'10
6 p.m.
On 11 May 2010 12:25, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> wrote:
Well there are several in very common use [...] I would have thought that many people who could make use of these - perhaps in ways that are not common at present (part numbers, error checked GPS coordinates ...).
But what do others think?
There's definitely a library there, and as much of it would be concept distilling, it might fit very well in GSoC. My disinterest is simply in the context of the Hash library, where I don't think they fit. (Input format is different, output format is different, and expected incidental errors are different.)