21 Apr
2006
21 Apr
'06
2:29 a.m.
On 4/20/06, Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu> wrote: I am not suggesting getting rid of Boost.Build entirely. BuildSystem
would be used for configuration, and Boost.Build could still be used for building. I use BuildSystem with SCons. Petsc uses it with make.
How would introducing yet another tool into the build process help in any way? I think Boost.Config (header files) plays the same role BuildSystem does in this case, with no extra tools required. -- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com