Re: [boost] Is there a thin array wrapper/proxy lying around somewhere?

25 Nov 2013

      AMDG

On 11/25/2013 01:22 AM, Mostafa wrote:
...
Because it does not meet the stated requirements. For one, it doesn't
have operator+, two, it doesn't have the necessary implicit
conversion-to-pointer operator, three regular arrays can't be assigned
to, etc ...
To be more clear, what is desired is a type that mimics all (well, I can
live with almost all [1]) the functionality of a regular array, no more,
no less.
[1] Initialization with array initializor list might be impossible to do
in C++03.
If you want something that behaves exactly like an
array, why can't you use an array?

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe