5 Nov
2009
5 Nov
'09
4:43 p.m.
Patrick Horgan wrote:
I would remove -pedantic, but otherwise, it's a very good idea. Unfortunately, recent discussion left me with the impression that few folks care. -pedantic issues all the warnings required by strict ISO C and ISO C++. They are in the standard for a reason, and I think it fair to expect system code that I build my code on to pass it. It's the same
Vladimir Prus wrote: parts of boost that always generate warnings. Other parts are always free of warnings. Not rocket science to know that some are building better code.
I bet this can be caused by the maintainers of some libraries using the same compiler you do. Using another compiler produces a different set of warnings. Bo Persson