On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 12:08:00 +0200 JD <jean.daniel.michaud@gmail.com> wrote:
Here is a couple of ideas I have glanced from previous threads:
Having done you research is a great start. As you can see, the opinions differ widely. I think you have to have a simple interface that is efficient and easy to use. However, you also need a way to offer extensive customizations. This is the hard part, and where the real problem exists.
I think this is where troubles starts. As I said, the logging library shall be simple to the cost of not being configurable at first. After inclusion to boost, it can get better. Yes, it looks like petty politics, but how come there is no logging library into boost with all
the interest it has in the past then ?
I think because there could not be a good enough agreement. You have to bring a very good library, with a polished argument. OR... you have to be willing to endure the lengthy discussions that will lead to such.