Joel de Guzman wrote:
On 10/14/2010 8:37 AM, Eric Niebler wrote:
On 10/13/2010 4:53 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
On 10/13/2010 11:24 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
I just worry that the focus on TMP is so intense that, potentially, design choices in the GP space that could vastly reduce the amount of TMP needed are missed.
+1
I share this sentiment. My focus on TMP has been so intense too that I am stepping back and reflecting on what I(/we) have done with Spirit, Fusion and Phoenix hoping to find an alternate path. My feeling is that I want to ease out a bit on TMP and focus more on GP.
All libraries that, IMO, have well-defined and easy-to-grasp concepts (in the GP sense). I wonder why you feel this way.
I'm not sure, Eric. It's just a gut feeling at this point. The overall complexity makes me feel lost in a TMP forest that I want to step out a bit to see the bigger picture.
I really feel the same way. I want simple things to be simple. Regards, Luke