Hi everyone, Is there any interest in having a lower level ringbuffer type in Boost.Lockfree ? The containers provided today in the library can only store homogeneous types of fixed size. At work, we have refined many implementations of ringbuffer classes that allow one to push/pop raw buffers. Before investing some time into a pull request, I wanted to know if there's some interest in such a type. The interface looks like this: template<typename Self, typename... Policies> class basic_ringbuffer { public: typedef ... buffer; public: buffer* start_write(size_t); void commit_write(size_t); void commit_write(buffer const*); buffer const* start_read(); void commit_read(size_t); void commit_read(buffer const*); public: void reader_reset(); void writer_reset(); private: buffer* _ring() { return static_cast<Self>(*this).ring(); } }; Of course, these are only the lowest level methods, one could implement push()/pop() or other higher level methods. Beyond the fact that this API provides by default zero-copy semantics, this interface is also agnostic to the actual owner of the memory, which allow users to implement custom ringbuffers easily (shared memory, mmap trick to map the beginning at the end, etc.), for example: class custom_ringbuffer : basic_ringbuffer<custom_ringbuffer, SomePolicies...> { buffer* ring() { return some_memory; } }; The usage would look like: custom_ringbuffer rb; // the write side if (auto buf = rb.start_write(100)) { memcpy(buf.data, "some data", 9); rb.commit_write(9); } // the read side if (auto buf = rb.start_read()) { std::cout << std::string_view(buf.data, buf.size) << std::endl; rb.commit_read(buf); } What do you think ? Did I miss something in boost itself ? Should I give a more complete overview of the API ? Cheers, -- Raphaël Londeix http://hotgloupi.fr