On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Beman Dawes
Should we continue to define BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES for VC++ 2013, or should we not define it and get signals2 working with a problem specific workaround?
I have a weak preference for not defining it, but would very much like to hear opinions for anyone, but particularly release managers.
My humble opinion is to not define it and implement workarounds in specific libraries until VC is fixed. I'm compiling boost trunk again right now, with variadic templates activated, to confirm if it would hurt my project but last time I tried it was not the main issue. That being said, did someone tried the test suite with vc12 already with variadic templates activated? If not I'm willing to try after I've finished checking if my project compiles.