9 Mar
2008
9 Mar
'08
4:39 p.m.
Peter Dimov-5 wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. This solution forces the use of shared_ptrs and might keep a Foo instance alive a little bit longer. Especially the latter requirement is a no-no for me.
If thread A is in the middle of a call to foo.f() and thread B attempts to destroy foo, your only options are (1) keep foo alive a little bit longer or (2) crash. Of course I may be missing something.
No, I believe you are correct, that's why I chose my own "architecture intrusive" way of implementing thread safe signals. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-signals-threadsafe-version--Atomic-disconnects-tp1541... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.