25 Mar
2006
25 Mar
'06
5:02 p.m.
Roland Schwarz wrote:
1. Generic data types instead of hard-coded 'double' Hmm, generic? int's won't make any sense would they?
Neal Becker wrote: perhaps double or float but what else?
I was thinking of any float-like type, but that's an interesting question. I'm afraid I don't have enough expertise to answer it - do any of these algorithms make sense for other numeric fields, (e.g., finite fields)?