David, In my design document I mention GMP as existing practice. The basic assembler method for example for multiplying is of course identical. But the large multiplications are different, see my document http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1718.pdf Another difference is that I use C++ in my implementation, while GMP uses C with a C++ wrapper interface. By the way I am already implementing the real, and computed 10^8 decimals of square roots and pi with my implementation, checked with a computer algebra program. After I submitted my source code to boost I assume it will be as public domain as GMP is, but subject to the boost license. Regards, Maarten. "David Gruener" <David.Gruener@gmx.net> wrote in message news:446C781E.8050205@gmx.net...
Maarten Kronenburg wrote:
Also I have a C++ implementation that will be submitted to boost some time.
How does your work relate to [1], especially when it comes to the point of existing practice for tr2?
Regards, David.
[1] http://www.swox.com/gmp _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost