[boost] Re: Is boost::fsm suitable for embedded systems?

Andreas Huber <ah2003 <at> gmx.net> writes:

I think it is virtually impossible to write a non-trivial library which incurs *no* overhead in all possible applications.

Yes, of course (I guess I expressed myself kinda sloppy).

IMHO hard real-time requirements are pretty much orthogonal to space/time requirements.

Agreed. I believe I wanted to interprete and squeeze that requirement to suit my needs...

I very much believe that boost::fsm is suitable for many embedded applications running in confined environments but there definitely are applications for which the library is too heavy-weight.

Ok, it is not just to drag in the boost::fsm then. I'll have to do a detailed analyze of the application and its enviroment. Thanks, /Thomas