Re: [boost] Boost threadsafe singleton?

Robert Ramey wrote:

Thanks for pointing this out.

It looks to me that this would require linking with the thread library.

I was thinking more along the lines of something built with the code in boost/detail/lightweigth_mutex

'lightweight_mutex' can't be safely initialized statically and there is no "lightweight_once". Without either of it, the Singleton wouldn't work properly with shared libraries - and so would the libraries using it. I'd have to go for the native threading APIs or extend the "lightweight suite". I put it on my list, for now. Regards, Tobias