1 Apr
2008
1 Apr
'08
5:48 p.m.
Anteru wrote:
James Talbut schrieb:
That's a useful idea, but doesn't alter the fact that date_time 1.35 has broken previously working code and should be altered to work harmoniously with other boost libraries. The windows include order dependencies are a nightmare and I think it's the responsibility of libs that force their inclusion to avoid making the situation worse than it is. In other words, if there are include order dependencies in boost it's a bug, IMO.
IMO, too, and I've openend a ticket for it: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1740
Not only because it breaks winsock.h, but I have an enum member ERROR and it's useless after including date_time :/
A global enumerated value called ERROR is not a good idea.