28 Oct
2010
28 Oct
'10
3:23 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus@gmail.com> wrote:
Another thing to consider is that when your argument is a value, "break if not" should technically work already since "not" will be treated by your compiler there as its actual meaning.
Okay, it's not exactly the same because the parameter ID "not" would "not" the entire parameter as though it were parenthesized, whereas the C++ "not" would have the expected (or in this case, possibly unexpected) order of operations. Actually, the more I think about it, that may lead to some subtle usage mistakes that I can't realistically check for :/ Using "not" may not be a great idea... -- -Matt Calabrese