Re: [boost] Standalone boost::ignore_unused_variable_warning()

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Antony Polukhin wrote:

I'd prefer to see a single function name, not two:

boost::ignore_unused_variables(v1) ; boost::ignore_unused_variables(v1, v2, v3);

[snip]

boost::utility:: namespace looks reasonable. +1

It feels more like a workaround, than a utility, and so I would have thought that: a. The more natural home is Boost.Config b. The macro approaches were preferable I also like the idea of not adding new things to Boost.Utility going forward (even if they only depend on Boost.Config). Best, Glen