Re: [boost] [MultiIndex] Why do constructions of multi_indx_base_type<> andmulti_index_node_type<> differ?

Hi Joaquin, On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz <joaquin@tid.es> wrote:

The seemingly superfluous nth_layer stuff was added in Boost 1.33 in order to help reduce the length of the resulting type names

[snip details] Thanks for an excellent explanation.

Any particular reason why you're studying the internals of B.MI?

In am dissecting MultiIndex with my students in C++ template meta-programming course. This lib is an amazing piece of work.

You're certainly a brave folk

LOL!

Get back if you need further help.

Posting another question in a new thread. Thanks a lot! Greg