12 Nov
2008
12 Nov
'08
10:32 a.m.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Mori Hess" <frank.hess@nist.gov> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 5:45 PM Subject: Re: [boost] [signals2] extended_slot_type bug with preferred syntax
I've looked at the documentation for the word 'thread' and I've found it only three times. I think the normal user wants to know more detailed informations about the thread safe signals library at a thread context. Do you also plan to enrich the documentation here?
Hmm, yes I think adding a section on thread-safety to the design overview would help a lot.
Could you scketch how do you plan to do this section if the libarry is accepted before the review manager gives the result of the review? Thanks, Vicente