22 Mar
2011
22 Mar
'11
2:10 p.m.
On 21.03.2011 21:06, Dave Abrahams wrote:
it's a mistake to break with a well-established convention that works just on principle. The chance that your alternative will work better in practice is extremely low.
I think that preference in /*hs/ names is some sort of (old) harmful habit, we must go away from this naming style. 50 years ago GOTO statement also were considered as excellent programming instrument. (progress isn't stayed) Even if my naming convention isn't sufficient, this is not means that yours is good enough :) to use it (In general, we must formulate a new naming convention for binary operator arguments.) -- - Do you speak English? Мужик с глубоким вздохом: - Yes I do. А хули толку?