3 May
2006
3 May
'06
6:17 p.m.
On May 3, 2006, at 3:44 AM, Nicola Musatti wrote:
Hallo, Doug. The attached patch for signal_test.cpp enables the alternative syntax for the Borland compilers as they still do not support the standard one.
I realize that this in itself could be considered a reason for the test to fail. What do you think? Maybe this patch could be applied to the RC_1_34_0 branch only and not to head.
Actually, this test is intended to fail on compilers that don't support the standard syntax. It should be identical to signal_n_test, which uses the more portable, alternative syntax. So, I'd rather not apply this patch. We should instead mark this as an expected failure in the regression test results. Doug